Two posts by Professor Bogdanski and Lars Larson, dealing with the subject of the use or non-use of the word "Christmas" in "Christmas tree," got me thinking on the subject. I found an illuminating history of Christmas trees at The History Channel. I'll summarize it as follows:
1. The tradition of decorating houses in winter with evergreens of some sort predates Christianity.
2. The Germans put up and decorated small Christmas trees starting in the 1600s. Colonial Americans deplored the joyous celebration of Christmas, and did not put up and decorate trees. The Mayflower group would have ostracized, or worse, anyone who decorated a tree to celebrate Christmas.
3. In the 1840s, Queen Victoria and Prince Albert put up a Christmas tree in London, and English and American society followed their lead. At about the same time, German immigrants to the United States, whose numbers were increasing, were putting up trees.
4. (Here I've added to the research of The History Channel with some other work.) By the 1880s or 1890s, the celebration of Christmas had become commercialized -- for example, F.W. Woolworth was importing glass ornaments for trees -- and the tree had become part of the secular and commercial celebration of Christmas in the United States. (Commerce really should have taken hold of Hanukkah instead, because it lasts for eight days and could have been an excuse for eight times the shopping that Christmas offers.)
I am not a Christian. I celebrate Christmas as a secular holiday. The Christmas tree in the town square doesn't bother me, because it's secular; in America it's not a symbol with religious origins. (Actually I rather like the idea of putting up a tree in my house to celebrate America's history of commercial enterprise.) Calling it a "holiday tree" suggests that we aren't really sure which holiday we're celebrating.
Recent Comments